[1] Zhang, X., Xiong, W., Peng, L., Wu, Y. & Hu, X. (2020). Highly selective absorption separation of H2S and CO2 from CH4 by novel azole-based protic ionic liquids, AIChE Journal, 66(6), 16936. doi: 10.1002/AIC.16936.
[2] Patil, T., Dharaskar, S., Pandya, J., Shinde, S., Sasi, S., Sillanpaa, M., Yoo, C. & Sekhara, T.C. (2023). Efficient CO2/CH4 separation using [Bmim][Ac]/Pebax-1657 supported ionic liquid membranes and its prediction by density functional theory. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 124, 103856.
[3] Ahmadi, R., Sanaeepur, H., Amooghin, A. E. & Heydari, A. (2018). Modification of Poly(ether-b-amide) Membrane Properties Using Glycerol for CO2/N2 Gas Separation. Iranian Journal of Polymer Science and Technology, 31(5), 461-474.
[4] Javadi, H., Vaezi, M. J. & Babaluo, A. A. (2024). A Review on Modification of Zeolite Membranes by Immersion Method in Polymer Solution: Improvement of Carbon Dioxide Separation Performance. Iranian Chemical Engineering Journal, 22(130), 27-42, [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijche.2023.352767.1225.
[5] Shabani, E., Rahbar Shahrouzi, J., Abbasi Sedaghat, S., Maghsoudi, H. & Ziaei, S. (2024). Molecular Simulation of Adsorption of H2S, CO2 and CH4 Gas Mixtures Onto Si-CHA Zeolite Using the Monte Carlo Method. Iranian Chemical Engineering Journal, 23(132), 85-99, [In Persian].
[6] Du, X., Feng, S., Luo, J., Zhuang, Y., Song, W., Li, X. & Wan, Y. (2023). Pebax mixed matrix membrane with bimetallic CeZr-MOFs to enhance CO2 separation. Separation Purification Technology, 322, 124251.
[7] Elyasi Kojabad M. E., Momeni M., Babaluo A. A. & Vaezi M. J. (2020). PEBA/PSf Multilayer Composite Membranes for CO2 Separation : Influence of Dip Coating Parameters. Chemical Engineering Technology, 43, 1451–1460.
[8] Abedini, R.; Omidkhah, M. & Dorosti, F. (2014). CO2/CH4 separation by a mixed matrix membrane of polymethylpentyne/MIL-53 particles. Iranian Journal of Polymer Science and Technology, 27, 351-337.
[9] Momeni, M., Kojabad M. E., Khanmohammadi, S., Farhadi, Z., Ghalandarzadeh, R., Babaluo, A. A. & Zare, M. (2019). Impact of support on the fabrication of poly (ether-b-amide) composite membrane and economic evaluation for natural gas sweetening. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 62, 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.12.014.
[10] Sadrzadeh, M., Amirilargani, M., Shahidi, K. & Mohammadi, T. (2009). Gas permeation through a synthesized composite PDMS/PES membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 342, 236-250.
[11] Murali, S. R., Ismail, A. F., Rahman, M. A. & Sridhar, S. (2014). Mixed matrix membranes of Pebax-1657 loaded with 4A zeolite for gaseous separations. Separation Purification Technology, 129, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.03.017.
[12] Bernardo, P. & Clarizia, G. (2020). Enhancing Gas Permeation Properties of Pebax® 1657 Membranes via Polysorbate Nonionic Surfactants Doping. Polymer, 12, 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12020253.
[13] Rahman, M. M., Filiz, V., Shishatskiy, S., Abetz, C., Neumann, S., Bolmer, S., Khan, M. M. & Abetz, V. (2013). PEBAX® with PEG functionalized POSS as nanocomposite membranes for CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 437, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.001.
[14] Meshkat, S., Kaliaguine, S. & Rodrigue, D. (2018). Mixed matrix membranes based on amine and non-amine MIL-53 (Al) in Pebax® MH-1657 for CO2 separation. Separation and Purification Technology, 200, 177–190.
[15] Zhang, N., Peng, D., Wu, H., Ren, Y., Yang, L. & Wu, X. (2018). Significantly enhanced CO2 capture properties by synergy of zinc ion and sulfonate in Pebax-pitch hybrid membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 549, 670–679.
[16] Mozaffari, V., Sadeghi, M., Fakhar, A., Khanbabaei, G. & Ismail, A. F. (2017). Gas separation properties of polyurethane/poly(ether-block-amide) (PU/PEBA) blend membranes. Separation Purification Technology, 185, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.seppur.2017.05.028.
[17] Qiu, Y., Ren, J., Zhao, D., Li, H. & Deng, M. (2016). Poly (amide-6-b-ethylene oxide)/ [Bmim][Tf2N] blend membranes for carbon dioxide separation. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 25, 122–130.
[18] Fam, W., Mansouri, J., Li, H. & Chen, V. (2017). Improving CO2 separation performance of thin film composite hollow fiber with Pebax®1657/ionic liquid gel membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 537, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.011.
[19] Mahdavi, H. R., Azizi, N. & Mohammadi, T. (2017). Performance evaluation of a synthesized and characterized Pebax1657/PEG1000/ γ-Al2O3 membrane for CO2/CH4 separation using response surface methodology. Journal of Polymer Research, 24 (67). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-017-1228-1.
[20] Shafiee, M., Akbari, A., Bahreini pour, I., Foroutan, R. & Ramavandi, B. (2020). The permeability and selectivity of nanocomposite membrane of PEBAx 1657/PEI/SiO2 for separation of CO2, N2, O2, CH4 gases: A data set. Data in Brief, 28, 104800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104800.
[21] Isanejad, M. & Mohammadi, T. (2018). Effect of amine modification on morphology and performance of poly (ether-block-amide)/fumed silica nanocomposite membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Material Chemistry Physics., 205, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.11.018.
[22] Lovineh, S. G., Asghari, M. & Khanbabaei, G. (2014). CO2 permeation through poly(amide-6-b-ethylene oxide)-nanosilica membranes. Applied Surface Science, 318, 176–179. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.027.
[23] Shamsabadi, A. A., Seidi, F., Salehi, E., Nozari, M., Rahimpour, A. & Soroush, M. (2017). Efficient CO2-removal using novel mixed-matrix membranes with modified TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 5, 4011–4025. https://doi.org/10.1039/
C6TA09990D.
[24] Pazirofteh, M., Abdolmajidi, M., Samipoorgiri, M., Dehghani, M. & Mohammadi A. H. (2019). Separation and transport specification of a novel PEBA-1074/ PEG-400/ TiO2 nanocomposite membrane for light gas separation: Molecular simulation study. Journal of Moleculare Liquids, 291, 111268.
[25] Zhu, H., Yuan, J., Zhao, J., Liu, G. & Jin, W. (2019). Enhanced CO2/N2 separation performance by using dopamine/polyethyleneimine-grafted TiO2 nanoparticles filled PEBA mixed-matrix membranes. Separation Purification Technology, 214, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.020.
[26] Azizi, N., Mohammadi, T. & Mosayebi Behbahani, R. (2017). Comparison of permeability performance of PEBAX-1074/TiO2, PEBAX-1074/SiO2 and PEBAX1074/Al2O3 nanocomposite membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 117, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.cherd.2016.10.018.
[27] Azizi, N., Mohammadi, T. & Behbahani, R. M. (2017). Synthesis of a PEBAX-1074/ZnO nanocomposite membrane with improved CO2 separation performance. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 26(3), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.11.018.
[28] Asghari, M., Sheikh, M. & Dehghani, M. (2018). Comparison of ZnO nanofillers of different shapes on physical, thermal and gas transport properties of PEBA membrane : experimental testing and molecular simulation. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 93(9), 2602-2616. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5614.
[29] Hossein, M. & Shirin, J. (2017). Investigation of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Gases Permeability Through PEBAX/PEG/ZnO Nanoparticle Mixed Matrix Membrane. Silicon, 9, 775–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9435-7.
[30] Amirkhani, F., Riasat, H. & Asghari, M. (2020). CO2/CH4 mixed gas separation using poly (ether -b- amide) -ZnO nanocomposite membranes : Experimental and molecular dynamics study. Polymer Testing, 86, 106464.
[31] Kojabad M. E., Babaluo A. A., Tavakoli A., Sofla R. L. M. & Kahnamouei H. G. (2021). Comparison of acidic and basic ionic liquids effects on dispersion of alumina particles in Pebax composite membranes for CO2/N2 separation: Experimental study and molecular simulation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9, 106116.
[32] Kojabad, M. E., Babaluo, A. A., Tavakoli, A. & Kahnamouei, H. G. (2021). Novel high performance facilitated transport membrane by simultaneously using semi-mobile and fixed carriers for CO2/N2 separation. Process Safety Environmental Protection, 156, 304-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSEP.2021.10.017.
[33] Lin, Z., Yuan, Z., Wang, K. & He, X. (2023). Synergistic tuning mixed matrix membranes by Ag+ doping in UiO-66-NH2/polymers of intrinsic microporosity for remarkable CO2/N2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 681, 121775.
[34] Bekhradinassab, E., Haghighi, M., Tavakoli, A. & Shabani, M. (2022). Mn-Fe catalyzed microwave combustion-plasma hybrid synthesis of 2D chips-like Mn-Fe boosted TiO2 architecture self-assembled of nano-walled honeycomb-like super-macroporous: Green fuel generation. Energy Conversion and Management, 270, 116178.
[35] He, Y., Wu, J., Li, S., Gong, X. & He, Y. (2024). Self-healing properties of GO nanofiltration membranes based on dialdehyde cellulose nanocrystals and ethylenediamine facilitate efficient separation of dyes, Journal of Membrane Science, 699, 122647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122647.
[36] Karamouz, F., Maghsoudi, H. & Yegani, R. (2018). Synthesis of High-Performance Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation. Chemical Engineering Technology, 41, 1767–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.036.
[37] Jha, A., Gupta, N., Divekar, S. & Dasgupta, S. (2024). Fabrication of high-performance biochar incorporated Pebax ® 1657 membranes for CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 188, 204–216.
[38] Bekhradinassab, E. Tavakoli, A., Haghighi, M. & Shabani, M. (2022). Catalytic biofuel production over 3D macro-structured cheese-like Mn-promoted TiO2 isotype : Mn-catalyzed microwave-combustion design. Energy Conversion and Management, 251, 114916.
[39] Lichaei, M. M., Pazani, F., Aroujalian, A. & Rodrigue, D. (2022). Two-step surface functionalization/alignment strategy to improve CO2/N2 separation from mixed matrix membranes based on PEBAX and graphene oxide. Process Safety Environironmental Protection, 163, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.05.024.
[40] Nobakht, D. & Abedini, R. (2023). A new ternary Pebax®1657/maltitol/ZIF-8 mixed matrix membrane for efficient CO2 separation, Process Safety Environironmental Protection, 170, 709–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.058.
[41] Lotfi Mayan Sofla, R., Rezaei, M. & Babaie, A. (2019). Investigation of the effect of graphene oxide functionalization on the physical, mechanical and shape memory properties of polyurethane/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Diamond Relation Material, 95, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.04.012.
[42] Hassanzadeh, H., Abedini, R. & Ghorbani, M. (2022). CO2 Separation over N2 and CH4 Light Gases in Sorbitol-Modified Poly (ether-block-amide) (Pebax 2533) Membrane. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 61 (36), 13669–13682.
[43] Li, S., Zhang, K., Liu, C., Feng, X., Wang, P. & Wang, S. (2023). Nanohybrid Pebax/PEGDA-GPTMS membrane with semi-interpenetrating network structure for enhanced CO2 separations. Journal of Membrane Science, 674, 121516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121516.
[44] Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Li, J., Liu, C. & Li, N. (2018). Mixed-matrix membranes based on Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-PEBA for high performance CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 560, 38–46.
[45] Shamsabadi, A. A., Seidi, F., Salehi, E., Nozari, M., Rahimpour, A. & Soroush, M. (2017). Efficient CO2-removal using novel mixed-matrix membranes with modified TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Material Chemistry, 5, 4011–4025. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta09990d.
[46] Zhou, T., Luo, L., Hu, S., Wang, S., Zhang, R. & Wu, H. (2015). Janus composite nanoparticle-incorporated mixed matrix membranes for CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 489, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.070.
[47] Huang, G., Pournaghshband, A., Muchtar, A. & Sakurai, K. (2018). Pebax/ionic liquid modified graphene oxide mixed matrix membranes for enhanced CO2 capture. Journal of Membrane Science, 565, 370–379.
[48] Habibiannejad, S.A., Aroujalian, A. & Raisi, A. (2016). surface modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes for gas separation. RSC Advances, 6, 79563–79577. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA14141B.
[49] Riasat Harami, H., Asghari, M. & Mohammadi, A. H. (2019). Magnetic nanoFe2O3–incorporated PEBA membranes for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separation: experimental study and grand canonical Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics. Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol., 9, 306–330.
[50] Song, C., Li, R., Fan, Z., Liu, Q., Zhang, B. & Kitamura, Y. (2020). CO2/N2 separation performance of Pebax/MIL-101 and Pebax/NH2-MIL-101 mixed matrix membranes and intensification via sub-ambient operation. Separation and Purification Technology, 238, 116500.
[51] Li, H., Tuo, L., Yang, K., Jeong, H., Dai, Y., He, G. & Zhao, W. (2016). Simultaneous enhancement of mechanical properties and CO2 selectivity of ZIF-8 mixed matrix membranes: Interfacial toughening effect of ionic liquid. Journal of Membrane Science, 511, 130–142.
