مهندسی شیمی ایران

مهندسی شیمی ایران

تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی منابع پایدار، روش‌های تولید و ذخیره‌سازی هیدروژن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناس مهندسی شیمی، دانشگاه مراغه
2 دانشیار مهندسی شیمی، دانشگاه مراغه
3 استادیار مهندسی شیمی، دانشگاه مراغه
چکیده
هیدروژن بهعنوان یک منبع انرژی پاک برای نیازهای گوناگون معرفی و از جنبههای مختلف مطالعه شدهاست؛ از اینرو چالش پیش رو انتخاب بهترین منبع تجدیدپذیر، فرایند دوستدار محیط زیست و ذخیرهسازی در چرخۀ تأمین هیدروژن است. تحلیل سلسلهمراتبی روش چندوجهی تصمیمگیری برمبنای محاسبات سازمانیافته برای اخذ تصمیم منطقی است که در این تحقیق برای گزینش در بین این موارد گسترده، از آن استفاده شد. در پایش منابع، توجیه اقتصادی با 47% اولویت بهعنوان معیار اصلی و منابع هیدرو با 33% اولویت بهعنوان گزینۀ نخست دارای بیشترین ارجحیت هستند. در موضوع فرایند تولید معیار منتخب توجیه اقتصادی با بیشترین ارجحیت و روش گرمایی با 32% ارجحیت نشانگر بالاترین اولویت است. در بحث ذخیرهسازی معیار اقتصادی مجدداً دارای بالاترین اولویت و ذخیرهسازی بهشکل نانومواد برترین گزینه است. ناسازگاری حساب‌شده در هر سه بخش مورد ارزیابی کمتر از 10% و قابل قبول است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Multi-Criteria Evaluation Green Sustainable Hydrogen:Sources, Productions, and Storage

نویسندگان English

A. Sadeghi 1
A. Karimi 2
H. Rajabi 1
S. Alipour 3
1 B. Sc. Chemical Engineering, University of Maragheh
2 Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering, University of Maragheh
3 Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering, University of Maragheh
چکیده English

Hydrogen has been introduced as a clean energy source for various demands and has been studied from different aspects. Therefore, the leading challenges are choosing the best renewable source, determining environmentally friendly processes, and selecting storing methods in the hydrogen supply chain. The analytic hierarchy process is a multidimensional decision-making method based on organized calculations to make logical decisions, which is used in this study to make decisions among these cases. For hydrogen sources, issue economic justification with 47% priority as the main criterion, and hydro resources with 33% priority as the most preferred option are determined. In the production process, the selected criterion is economic justification as the most preferred one, and the thermal method with 32% preference has the highest priority. In the storage topic, economic justification has the highest priority, and storage in the form of nanomaterials is identified as the best option. The calculated inconsistency in all three evaluated sections is less than 10% and is acceptable.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Analytic Hierarchy Process
Hydrogen Source
Hydrogen Generation
Hydrogen Storage System
[1]        Sagir, E., & Alipour, S. (2021). Photofermentative hydrogen production by immobilized photosynthetic bacteria: Current perspectives and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, 110796.
[2]        Sagir, E., Alipour, S., Elkahlout, K., Koku, H., Gunduz, U., Eroglu, I., & Yucel, M. (2017). Scale-up studies for stable, long-term indoor and outdoor production of hydrogen by immobilized Rhodobacter capsulatus. international journal of hydrogen energy, 42(36), 22743-22755.
[3]        Hosseini, S. E., & Wahid, M. A. (2016). Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 850-866.
[4]        Dincer, I., & Acar, C. (2017). Innovation in hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(22), 14843-14864.
[5]        Ceran, B. (2020). Multi-Criteria comparative analysis of clean hydrogen production scenarios. Energies, 13(16), 4180.
[6]        Nikolaidis, P., & Poullikkas, A. (2017). A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 67, 597-611.
[7]        Acar, C., & Dincer, I. (2019). Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment. Journal of cleaner production, 218, 835-849.
[8]        Jastrzębski, K., & Kula, P. (2021). Emerging technology for a green, sustainable energy-promising materials for hydrogen storage, from nanotubes to graphene—a review. Materials, 14(10), 2499.
[9]        Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2019). Complex Chemical Process Evaluation Methods Using a New Analytic Hierarchy Process Model Integrating Deep Residual Network with Multiway Principal Component Analysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 58(31), 13889-13899.
[10]      Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006). Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update. Energy, 31(14), 2604-2622.
[11]      Lopes, J. V. M., Bresciani, A. E., Carvalho, K. D. M., Kulay, L. A., & Alves, R. M. D. B. (2021). Multi-criteria decision approach to select carbon dioxide and hydrogen sources as potential raw materials for the production of chemicals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, 111542.
[12]      Dos Santos, P. H., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., De Oliveira, C. H., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production, 212, 119-138.
[13]      Jahangiri, M., Shamsabadi, A. A., Mostafaeipour, A., Rezaei, M., Yousefi, Y., & Pomares, L. M. (2020). Using fuzzy MCDM technique to find the best location in Qatar for exploiting wind and solar energy to generate hydrogen and electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(27), 13862-13875.
[14]      Inal, O. B., & Deniz, C. (2020). Assessment of fuel cell types for ships: Based on multi-criteria decision analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121734.
[15]      Karimi, A., Mohamadmoradi, H. R. (2020). Study of Reducing the Amount of Green Oil in the CCR Plant of Oil Refinery Unit. Iranian Chemical Engineering Journal, 18(107), 6-14.
[16]      Karimi, A., Nejhab Abyaz, H., Rahimzadeh, K., & Fatehifar, E. (2022). Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process to Study the Industrial Air Pollution Control Equipment: Optimal Choice. Farayandno, 17(79), 5-14.
[17]      Karimi, A., & Sadeghi, A. (2022). AHP-Based amine selection in sour gas treating process: simulation and optimization. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, (Articles in Press).
[18]      Alipour, S., Sadeghi, A., Omidvarborna, H., & Karimi, A. (2022). Techno-economic assessment of the AHP based selected method for separating formic acid from an aqueous effluent. Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 56(1), 105-121.
[19]      Alipour, S., Sagir, E., & Sadeghi, A. (2022). Multi-criteria decision-making approach assisting to select materials for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cell: Electrolyte, cathode& anode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(45), 19810-19820.
[20]      Alipour, S., Karimi, A., & Savari, C. (2018). Techno-economic analysis of small scale electricity generation from the lignocellulosic biomass. Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 52(2), 193-200.
[21]      Alipour, S., Ghafelebaashi, A. H., & Savari, C. (2021). Techno-Economic Analysis of the Levulinic Acid Synthesis from Monosaccharides. Iranian Chemical Engineering Journal, 20(118), 7-21.