Iranian Chemical Engineering Journal

Iranian Chemical Engineering Journal

Separation of Ethyl Acetate from Water via Pervaporation Using a Novel Silicone-Based Membrane

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 MSc. in Biomedical Engineering, University of Tehran
2 Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tehran
3 Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology
Abstract
This study investigated the performance of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane, commercially known as ELASTOSIL® RT 601 A/B, for separating ethyl acetate from water via pervaporation. The membrane was selected due to its structural similarity to PDMS, excellent hydrophobicity, lower cost, and wider availability. Characterization techniques such as FTIR, FESEM, and water contact angle measurements were employed to evaluate the membrane. Pervaporation experiments were conducted at temperatures ranging from 30 to 50°C and feed concentrations of 5 to 15 wt% ethyl acetate under a vacuum pressure of 200 mbar. The results demonstrated that at 5 wt% feed concentration and 30°C, the membrane achieved a total flux of 0.73 kg/m²·h and a selectivity of 33.2. Increasing the temperature to 50°C nearly doubled the permeate flux but reduced selectivity by 20%. Similarly, raising the feed concentration to 15 wt% doubled the flux but decreased selectivity by 40%. The study highlights the efficacy of ELASTOSIL® RT 601 A/B as a cost-effective and accessible membrane for ethyl acetate-water separation under varying operational conditions.
Keywords
Subjects

[1]        Zhan, X., Gao, T., Lu, J., Liu, J., Wang, M., & Li, J. (2020). POSS/PDMS MMMs with reversal trade-off effect: characterization and enhanced permeation flux. Desalination and Water Treatment, 187,287-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25416. doi: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25416.
[2]        Liu, G., & Jin, W. (2021). Pervaporation membrane materials: Recent trends and perspectives. Journal of Membrane Science, 636, 119557. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119557.
[3]        Wee, S. -L., Tye, C. -T., & Bhatia, S. (2008). Membrane separation process—Pervaporation through zeolite membrane. Separation and Purification Technology, 63(3), 500-516. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.07.010.
[4]        Luis, P., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2015). The driving force as key element to evaluate the pervaporation performance of multicomponent mixtures. Separation and Purification Technology, 148, 94-102.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.05.006.
[5]        Shirazi, Y., Ghadimi, A., & Mohammadi, T. (2012). Recovery of alcohols from water using polydimethylsiloxane–silica nanocomposite membranes: Characterization and pervaporation performance. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 124(4), 2871-2882. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.35313.
[6]        Lakshmy, K. S., Lal, D., Nair, A., Babu, A., Das, H., Govind, N., Penkova, A. (2022). Pervaporation as a successful tool in the treatment of industrial liquid mixtures. Polymers, 14(8), 1604. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/8/1604.
[7]        Andre, A., Nagy, T., Toth, A. J., Haaz, E., Fozer, D., Tarjani, J. A., & Mizsey, P. (2018). Distillation contra pervaporation: Comprehensive investigation of isobutanol-water separation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 804-818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.157.
[8]        Wang, S., Dai, Y., Ma, Z., Qi, H., Chen, Z., Shen, Y., ... Zhu, Z. (2021). Application of energy-saving hybrid distillation-pervaporation process for recycling organics from wastewater based on thermoeconomic and environmental analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126297.
[9]        Van Hoof, V., Van den Abeele, L., Buekenhoudt, A., Dotremont, C., & Leysen, R. (2004). Economic comparison between azeotropic distillation and different hybrid systems combining distillation with pervaporation for the dehydration of isopropanol. Separation and Purification Technology, 37(1), 33-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2003.08.003.
[10]      Van Hoof, V., Van Den Abeele, L., Buekenhoudt, A., Dotremont, C., & Leysen, R. (2004). Economic comparison between azeotropic distillation and different hybrid systems combining distillation with pervaporation for the dehydration of isopropanol. Separation and Purification Technology, 37(1),33-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.11.019.
[11]      Meng, D., Dai, Y., Xu, Y., Wu, Y., Cui, P., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y. (2020). Energy, economic and environmental evaluations for the separation of ethyl acetate/ethanol/water mixture via distillation and pervaporation unit. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 140, 14-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.039.
[12]      Slater, C. S. (1997). Recovery of ethyl acetate from process effluents using pervaporation technology. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A, 32(5), 1339-1352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/
10934529709376613.
[13]      Penkova, A., Polotskaya, G., & Toikka, A. (2015). Pervaporation composite membranes for ethyl acetate production. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 87, 81-87. doi: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.cep.2014.11.015.
[14]      Knozowska, K., Kujawski, W., Zatorska, P., & Kujawa, J. (2018). Pervaporative efficiency of organic solvents separation employing hydrophilic and hydrophobic commercial polymeric membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 564, 444-455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.030.
[15]      Genduso, G., Farrokhzad, H., Latré, Y., Darvishmanesh, S., Luis, P., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2015). Polyvinylidene fluoride dense membrane for the pervaporation of methyl acetate–methanol mixtures. Journal of Membrane Science, 482,
128-136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.008.
[16]      Hasanoğlu, A., Salt, Y., Keleşer, S., Özkan, S., & Dinçer, S. (2005). Pervaporation separation of ethyl acetate–ethanol binary mixtures using polydimethylsiloxane membranes. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 44(3), 375-381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2004.06.001.
[17]      Shi, W., Han, X., Bai, F., Hua, C., & Cao, X. (2021). Enhanced desulfurization performance of polyethylene glycol membrane by incorporating metal organic framework MOF-505. Separation and Purification Technology, 272, 11892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118924.
[18]      Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Lin, Z., Wu, R., Fang, R., Guo, W., & Yao, J. (2024). Boosting pervaporation performance of polyether block amide membranes by embedding structural-evolution zeolitic imidazolate framework-71s for phenol/water separation. Separation and Purification Technology, 339, 126593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.126593.
[19]      Parvez, A. M., Luis, P., Ooms, T., Vreysen, S., Vandezande, P., Degrève, J., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2012). Separation of ethyl acetate–isooctane mixtures by pervaporation and pervaporation-based hybrid methods. Chemical Engineering Journal, 210, 252-262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.091.
[20]      Bell, C., Gerner, F., & Strathmann, H. (1988). Selection of polymers for pervaporation membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 36, 315-329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(88)80025-5.
[21]      Chen, J., Li, J., Qi, R., Ye, H., & Chen, C. (2008). Pervaporation performance of crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane membranes for deep desulfurization of FCC gasoline: I. Effect of different sulfur species. Journal of Membrane Science, 322(1), 113-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.032.
[22]      Ong, Y. K., Shi, G. M., Le, N. L., Tang, Y. P., Zuo, J., Nunes, S. P., & Chung, T.-S. (2016). Recent membrane development for pervaporation processes. Progress in Polymer Science, 57, 1-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.02.003.
[23]      Rostovtseva, V., Faykov, I., & Pulyalina, A. (2022). A review of recent developments of pervaporation membranes for ethylene glycol purification. Membranes, 12(3), 312. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/12/3/312
[24]      Vatani, M., Raisi, A., & Pazuki, G. (2018). Pervaporation separation of ethyl acetate from aqueous solutions using ZSM-5 filled dual-layer poly (ether-block-amide)/polyethersulfone membrane. RSC advances, 8(9), 4713-4725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA13382K
[25]      Hosseini, S. S., Pahlevanzadeh, H., and Tamadondar, M.. (2014). Dehydration of Organic Compounds Using Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Membrane in a Pervaporation Process. Iranian Chemical Engineering Journal, 13(72), [Online], [In Persian]. Available: https://www.ijche.ir/article_112379_1678bdc6338cb96371202b894aeb856d.pdf
[26]      Ali, Z., Zhang, X., Khan, P., Li, J., Zhang, N., Wang, Q., Shan, L. (2025). Self-assembled ILs-PVA micelle nanostructure impart the pervaporation membrane with high ethanol dehydration performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 715, 123481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123481.
[27]      Jiang, L., Luo, T., Yuan, S., Wang, Y., Xiao, X., Wang, R., Van der Bruggen, B. (2025). Recent Advances in Membrane Synthesis by Interfacial Polymerization for Pervaporation. Advanced Functional Materials, 2500708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202500708.
[28]      Johnston, I. D., McCluskey, D. K., Tan, C. K., & Tracey, M. C. (2014). Mechanical characterization of bulk Sylgard 184 for microfluidics and microengineering. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 24(3), 035017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/24/3/035017.
[29]      Wang, H., & Wang, M. (2020). Comparison of membrane-based acid-recovering processes under different driving forces using tailor-made proton permselective membrane. Separation and Purification Technology, 248, 117011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117011.
[30]      Kamelian, F. S., Mohammadi, T., & Naeimpoor, F. (2019). Fast, facile and scalable fabrication of novel microporous silicalite-1/PDMS mixed matrix membranes for efficient ethanol separation by pervaporation. Separation and Purification Technology, 229, 115820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115820.
[31]      Hansen, C. M. (2007). Hansen solubility parameters: a user's handbook: CRC press.
[32]      Stefanis, E., & Panayiotou, C. (2008). Prediction of Hansen solubility parameters with a new group-contribution method. International Journal of Thermophysics, 29, 568-585. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z.
[33]      Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Ragadhita, R., & Aziz, M. (2023). How to calculate and measure solution concentration using UV-vis spectrum analysis: Supporting measurement in the chemical decomposition, photocatalysis, phytoremediation, and adsorption process. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(2), 345-362. doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v8i2.57783.
[34]      Ramlan, N., Zubairi, S. I., & Maskat, M. Y. (2022). Response surface optimisation of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) on borosilicate glass and stainless steel (SS316) to increase hydrophobicity. Molecules, 27(11), 3388, [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/11/3388.
[35]      Bodas, D., & Khan-Malek, C. (2006). Formation of more stable hydrophilic surfaces of PDMS by plasma and chemical treatments. Microelectronic engineering, 83(4-9), 1277-1279. doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.195.
[36]      Baker, R. W. (2023). Membrane technology and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
[37]      Song, X., Song, X., Zhang, Y., & Fan, J. (2023). Improving the Pervaporation Performance of PDMS Membranes for Trichloroethylene by Incorporating Silane-Modified ZSM-5 Zeolite. Polymers, 15(18), 3777, [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/18/3777.